Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Monday, June 8, 2009
Tail wheel rating and boat
Got my tail wheel rating yesterday. It took 5 h and 10 min with a total of 53 landings! 49 of those were done yesterday during 3 1/2 hours. It was done in a Piper Cub where I have a chare (actually it is a "loan" to keep it operational, because the airplane is no less than a flying museum artifact belonging to Bodø Aircraft Museum). The Cub is an old Army Cub from 1954 used by the Military, an PA-18 Super Cub with 90 HP Continental engine. They say only 4 of these were built. Starting is by hand. I had my first solo ride in it this evening. All my flying from now on will be in this cub untill my -4 is finished. After having flown advanced aerodynamic shaped carbon fibre aircraft (The Atec Zephyr), it is almost unbelievable how extremely good this Cub is, a 80+ year old design.
Three weeks ago I also purchased an old boat. A 22' "snekke" (I have no idea what the english term for this boat class is, but the closest is probably a "positive displacement" cabin cruiser). It weighs 2 tons, has a 15 HP Yanmar diesel, and is perfect for cruising around in the fjord at sunny days. The boat is a homebuilt from the late 70s. Cruise speed (and max speed) is around 6 knots. The cruise speed of my RV-4 will be 30 times that! The pictures are with two of my sons today, and with Olaug last weekend where we went to Tautra, an island in the fjord with a 12 century monestary.
Three weeks ago I also purchased an old boat. A 22' "snekke" (I have no idea what the english term for this boat class is, but the closest is probably a "positive displacement" cabin cruiser). It weighs 2 tons, has a 15 HP Yanmar diesel, and is perfect for cruising around in the fjord at sunny days. The boat is a homebuilt from the late 70s. Cruise speed (and max speed) is around 6 knots. The cruise speed of my RV-4 will be 30 times that! The pictures are with two of my sons today, and with Olaug last weekend where we went to Tautra, an island in the fjord with a 12 century monestary.
Friday, June 5, 2009
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Riveted on the rudder skin
Monday, June 1, 2009
Stiffeners elevator, Rudder
Finished drilling and deburring the stiffeners on the left elevator. Started again on the rudder. The skin has to be riveted on to free up some clamps that is on the rudder jig before doing anything else.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Left elevator stiffeners
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Trimmed the stiffeners
Finished the stiffeners for the left elevator.
Labels:
elevator stiffeners,
left elevator,
trimming
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Monday, May 4, 2009
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Riveted right elevator skeleton, started on left
Saturday, May 2, 2009
More priming
Did some more priming. Riveted on the brackets for the elevator hinges and the hinge nut.
Friday, May 1, 2009
Priming elevator parts
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Rudder and elevator
I was going to prime, but run out of gloves. Have to put pop rivets (LP4-3) in R-410 because none of my tools fit inside, and I have already riveted the assembly together. Due to some drilling difficulties, I will have one 4/32 and one 5/32 solid rivet, and two LP4-3 rivets. This looks strange, but is perfectly OK.
Monday, April 27, 2009
Drilled holes in elevator hinge plate
Drilled the holes in the attachment plates for the elevator hinge. Then I did a cleanup of the whole shop (long overdue). Wrote into the build logbook all the things done last year(copyed from this blog). This logbook will follow the airplane throughout its lifetime.
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Elevator hinges and horn
Friday, April 17, 2009
Details on elevator
Couldn't figure out how to position the bend on the lower flange on E-404 to mate with the spar. Instead I made an angle that I will rivet on to the spar and E-404. Marked rivets and fluted the elevator ribs.
Monday, April 13, 2009
elevator stiffeners and horn
Riveted on the stiffeners to the right elevator skin.
Started fitting the elevator horn and went straight into problems again. The elevator horn has pre punched holes. The problem is that the inner most holes are punched at least 3-4/16 too far in, so they interfere with flange of the E-409 rib. I didn't notice that before the spar and rib already was riveted together. Had to drill the rivets out and file 3/16 off the flange, and rivet together again. From the drawings and manual it is obvious that the horn originally was not pre-punched. Not a big deal, but still.
Started fitting the elevator horn and went straight into problems again. The elevator horn has pre punched holes. The problem is that the inner most holes are punched at least 3-4/16 too far in, so they interfere with flange of the E-409 rib. I didn't notice that before the spar and rib already was riveted together. Had to drill the rivets out and file 3/16 off the flange, and rivet together again. From the drawings and manual it is obvious that the horn originally was not pre-punched. Not a big deal, but still.
Labels:
elevator,
elevator horn,
elevator stiffeners
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Elevator skeleton and priming
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Elevator skin ready for priming and dimpling
Friday, April 10, 2009
Elevator and rudder
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Drilling the rudder
Monday, April 6, 2009
Fixing rudder
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Fighters, another look
Digged out an old SOM software that I made some 10 years ago. SOM = Self Organizing Map, and is a kind of artificial neural network that maps multidimensional vectors on to a 2D map according to a highly non-linear algorithm. On this map, similar vectors become clustered together, while non similar vectors are far apart or have "mountains" between them. It is used for instance in match-making software, image analysis, pattern recognition and so on. A SOM will only show the relative differences, nothing more.
The basic data for an airplane is a typical vector. So I simply feed the SOM with airplane data (several T/W and wing loading data and some other stuff), and let the artificial neurons do their job making some maps.
On the first picture, the map became devided in two distinct regions. "Real" fighters are on the left, while more fighter bomber planes are on the right. The Gripen and the Rafale are also somewhat isolated from the rest of the fighters. The F-35 is very similar to the F-18E. So, the F-35 is for all practical purposes (practical in a T/W ratio, wing loading sence :-) ; a stealthy F-18E. If this is good or bad, I don't know, but the F-35 is certainly no real fighter in a "classical" sense relative to the fighter bunch.
On the other picture I have "hard wired" a mystery plane in the middle and let the SOM work to see the similarities with the others. Clarly the mystery plane is very different from the rest, probably much better looking :-) But, it has to be built...
The basic data for an airplane is a typical vector. So I simply feed the SOM with airplane data (several T/W and wing loading data and some other stuff), and let the artificial neurons do their job making some maps.
On the first picture, the map became devided in two distinct regions. "Real" fighters are on the left, while more fighter bomber planes are on the right. The Gripen and the Rafale are also somewhat isolated from the rest of the fighters. The F-35 is very similar to the F-18E. So, the F-35 is for all practical purposes (practical in a T/W ratio, wing loading sence :-) ; a stealthy F-18E. If this is good or bad, I don't know, but the F-35 is certainly no real fighter in a "classical" sense relative to the fighter bunch.
On the other picture I have "hard wired" a mystery plane in the middle and let the SOM work to see the similarities with the others. Clarly the mystery plane is very different from the rest, probably much better looking :-) But, it has to be built...
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
R-410
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)